Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Exxon Corporation v. Chick Kam Choo, 86-2428 (1988)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 86-2428 Visitors: 13
Filed: Jul. 01, 1988
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 849 F.2d 910 EXXON CORPORATION, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. CHICK KAM CHOO, et al., Defendants-Appellants. No. 86-2428. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. July 1, 1988. Joseph C. Blanks, Beaumont, Tex., for defendants-appellants. James Patrick Cooney, Houston, Tex., for plaintiffs-appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Norman W. Black, Judge. Before CLARK, Chief Judge, and GEE and REAVLEY, Circuit Judges. ON REMAND FROM THE SU
More

849 F.2d 910

EXXON CORPORATION, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
CHICK KAM CHOO, et al., Defendants-Appellants.

No. 86-2428.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.

July 1, 1988.

Joseph C. Blanks, Beaumont, Tex., for defendants-appellants.

James Patrick Cooney, Houston, Tex., for plaintiffs-appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Norman W. Black, Judge.

Before CLARK, Chief Judge, and GEE and REAVLEY, Circuit Judges.

ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

PER CURIAM:

1

Obedient to the mandate of the Supreme Court, --- U.S. ----, 108 S. Ct. 1684, 100 L. Ed. 2d 127 (1988), we vacate the trial court's judgment, as well as ours affirming it, 817 F.2d 307, (5th Cir.1987), and remand the cause to that court for further proceedings in conformity with the opinion above.

2

VACATED AND REMANDED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer